Reply to comment

Bible translations

Submitted by Stephen Anderson on Thu, 04/09/2009 - 21:03
I know there was plenty of discussion on the March 26 poll regarding Bible translations. This is where the discussion should continue. Several felt that the King James Version is the only version that can be trusted, but several people, myself included feel that others can certainly be counted on from at least just a reading standpoint. There were also interesting points made about the Bible codes. Any thoughts on any of that?

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <span> <img> <div> <pp_img> <pp_media> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br> <blockquote> <table> <tbody> <tr> <th> <td>
  • Insert images and media with <pp_img> or <pp_media>. See formatting options for syntax.

More information about formatting options